the quasars doesn't shows a good relation between the redshift (distace, age) and apparent magnitude
some note ... in the ' proposed ' formula , the anom. vel. must be corrected relativistically for very higth velocity and the starting temp. rad. can be calculated from the received temp. , which is always known....
2. the quasars do not show good relation between redshift and apparent magnitude:
Again the book of F.Selleri - "Fisica senza dogma" - Ed. Dedalo, helps us when , at page 219 , he assert '' it is a thing against the logic (...) if the redshift should be considered a measure of the distances (.) because we see luminous quasars having huge or small movements toward ' the red ' ,without a rule ,and the same thing it is happening with the less luminous quasars.''
b) following the 'proposed' formula , the rad. vel. for stars far 4000 y.l. should be increased of 0,1 km/s ( in the case of stars with high temp. ( spectal type O ,B , A ) untill 10 -20 km/s ) ; Those values are detectable with difficulty bvecause of the unhomogeneous distribuition of the stars , unordered proper motus of the stars (often higher than 50 km/s ) , differential rotation of the galaxy , 'selection' effect etc. etc....;
However, lets take from the web-site CDS of Strasbourg the catalogue V/105 , added up with the H D stars from cat. III/218 and III/216. We get more than 30000 stars with rad. vel., dist., temp.(B-V) ,spect. type, and we choose only the 8250 stars of the main sequency at the dist. 60 -2000 y.l., with rad. vel. and proper motus included in + 50 km/s and -50 km/s, in order to have a more regular statistics. Moreover, we shall use a sistem of comparated averages, where the sky is shared in 8 similar parts relatively to the longitude and latitude ; and we consider the average of the single averages.
In the 8250 choiced stars:
- the 3000 nearest ( dist. 60-260 y.l.) have a rad. vel. compar. of 0,06 km/s ;
- the 3000 farest (dist. 500-2000 y.l.) have average comp. of + 0,45 km/s ..
so it seems that for an increase of distance from 190 to 950 y.l. , the rad. vel. increases from 0,06 km/s to 0,45 km/s .
Someone can properly observe that the nearest stars are not like the farest stars...:
if , in the nearest 3000 , we take the 560 stars with specrtal type A , we found that they have a rad. vel. comp.of -1,1 km/s , the 60 stars with spectral type B have comp. average -0,2 km/s; in the farest 3000 , the 660 stars A have rad. vel comp. of -1,3 km/s; the 1170 B stars +0,9 km/s; the average of nearest group of A and B is -0,65 km/s, the farest group is -0,2 with an increasement of +0,45 km/s..
Thus it seems possible an increase of the rad. vel jointed with an increase of the distance ( and temperature ).. and it's more probable than improbable...
