|
|
www.einstein.badboy.it
Introduction to some strange situations that the relativity can solve correctly ( A ) or even describe ( B ) or decide ( C ), only admitting a ( forgotten ) postulate with the probable consequence that time and space become once again absolute
Einstein gave many contributions to the phisics, but in many cases he made the things too simple."all phisical phenomenas, at the same conditions, are developing in the same way, in an inertial system"
( or : all reference systems are equivalent when we are describing physical phenomenas)
With the second postulate he established that :
the light ' s speed seems to be the same to all the observers and it is independent from the source 's movements.
But the light , as everybody knows , is a propagation , i.e. an effect ,
which can have proper laws (of course, the speed with which I turn off the ligth can
have no influence in the speed of the lamp ' s ligthing ).
In his general relativity theory, Einstein took the assumption that the acceleration and the gravity are similar: too many
simplifications could have made some holes in his theories ...
The maximum speed is 300.000 km/s : the earth is going around the sun and
the sunlight takes 500 sec to arrive, running 150.000.000 km at the speed of 300.000 km/s ;
I am with my dog on the earth. Let's suppose that at one time I go away, leaving the earth, and that my dog goes away six months later,
we found ourselves in diametrally opposite positions ...
Question if we turn on a candle at the same time,
after how many seconds our lights reaches the sun ?
answer : after 500 s.
Question if we turn on a candle at the same time, after how many seconds my light reaches
the one emitted by my dog?
answer after 500 s.
it means that after 500 seconds two opposite ligths travelling one against the other, have covered the distance of 300.000.000 km so their relative speed seems to be 600.000 km/s (!)
Question : suppose now that me and my dog are able to follow the emitted light, let say at the speed of 250.000 km/s. When we meet each other, at which velocity are we crashing ?
Perhaps these relativistic theories need a forgotten postulate :
THE
SPEED HAS MEANING AS REGARDS THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD
In that way Michelson doesn't get angry and the crash with my dog at the relative
effective speed of 500.000 km/s can be explained in energetic terms with a direct crash at 250.000 km/s + 250.000 km/s following the relativistic formula of the
speed composition ( Vab = (Va + Vb )/ ( 1+ (Va Vb/ C ^2 ) ;
Through the measurement of the emitted frequencies of the sunlight and of my dog's candle light , i shall know that I'm reaching the first at 250.000 km/s and the second at 500.000 km/s ,
but measuring my speed in the gravitational ( solar ) system , i shall understand that our hypotetic collison shall be less destructive than a simple
collison with the speed of 296.000 km/s (A)!
N.B. In the opposite way , with me and my dog departing at the effective speed of 500.000 km/s , trying to follow the sunrays emitted by the sun in opposite
directions , the light ( propagation and effect ) emitted eventually by me ,shall reach always my dog , because each wave's front is emitted in different positions .
Again more contadictions:
The forgotten postulate is necessary to measure the speeds as regards the gravitational system with a right weight (MEANING ) using the usual formulas.
An other situation to clarify is the twins paradox :
Assume the twins beeing on a football field going at the speed of 150.000 km/s around the earth. The twins have two rockets. On the four field's corners there are
installed four clocks. I'm in the center of the field and I ligth a match. Meauring the times in which the four clocks
receive the match's ligth , I can probably understand in which direction the field is moving at 150.000 km/s as regards the earth's gravitational system.
At this point, only who increases his speed remains young while who leaves on the opposite direction becames older than who remains on the field ( C ).
Since we can always know our speed and our gravity, we could make the necessary corrections over the
space and the time
( dealing them as normal variables ) and we could hope to live in a continuous and understandeble universe .
FAQ
1) Are there any mistake in the Einstein's laws?
NO, they are surely correct, as true as their marvellous previsions and confirmations, but they still comply with the 'forgotten' postulate.
2) what is adding this 'new' postulate ?
This one punctualizes over the gravity ; it completes and generalizes the theory respecting the existing formulas .
With the 'forgotten' postulate we are not going against the common sense that two beams of light ( or two rockets, as you prefer ) , leaving away in opposite directions, as is departing one from the other at the speed of 600.000 km/s ( or just 500.000 km/s ) : and that is real !
In one second the sunlight is filling a sphere with diameter of 600.000 km , in two seconds the diameter is 1.200.000 km : the distance between the opposite wave's front is 1.200.000 km !
.
3)Any doubts with the formulas of relativity?
No , we only realize that 'somebody' forget to show how ( the starting hypothesis ) to measure the speeds ( and the energy ) ; and again, with the first ( mistaken !?) postulate 'someone' gives importance to the inertial movement increasing the confusion because the base of the movement is the gravitational system to whom we are belonging .
4) Are there other little consequences?
Often the philosophy of the relativity has replaced the philosofy of the reality, with the consequence of denying the possibility to consider the universe like an "all jointed" ....;
somebody starting from the relativity can show that 'IF A=B AND B=C" THEN A can be different from C, or that the universe does not exist .. a grey world is better than nothing .
5) Is this Classic Phisics, or not?
A little story : an old deaf man is sitting inside in a big rotating pot with a stone and some measurement instruments ( a meter, a clock, a gravitometer ( optional ) ). The big pot is on a sailing ship ; after a while he ( probably ) will be able to say 'hello' to whom is approaching to the pot, how many rotations the pot is doing, where the ship has been and where and when shall happen the next moon's eclipse.
A visitor could then ask to him ''which is reference system ? '', but he doesn't hear and however ( probably ) he should not be able to answer .
6)Are there other ( smaller ) consequences of the forgotten postulate ?
Regarding the dragth of the light in the ether, the important thing is the speed as regard to the gravitational center. Therefore in the Michelson's experiment, considering 0,4 km/s the rotational velocity of the earth at our latitude ( against calcules done like 30 km/s ) , it shall be necessary an approximation at least 6.000 times bigger.
7) Is it possible the discovery of the absolute movement, in that way ?
No, only the "gravitational movement" , as regards to the gravitational center: that means that an electron ( rotating around his nucleo ) and a transporting rocket ( around the solar system ) should go almost at the light speed and they could rotate in the galaxie at 300 km/s .
8) What happens when an object in movement is changing its gravitational center ?
Its velocity should not exceed 300.000 km/s as regard to its gravitational center and the Einstein's formulas of the speed composition shall help in the calculation of new speed.
